Mar 13, 2012 - It's not the best catch, but maybe the best one with the stupid rules they have now. Once it crosses the rope it should be six. It's a shocking rule and it must be changed.
London6614 Says:
Mar 10, 2012 - There are couple of players in world take catches like that I saw Matthews, Kapugedara, Dilshan, and Herath of Sl team , Hussey , Jonty rodes, Roshan Mahanama, Kalapge
London6614 Says:
Mar 10, 2012 - wow its like Sri Lankan fielder Angelo Matthews did in 2010
SuperUltraKO Says:
Mar 6, 2012 - yeah Ravi shastri is a lame comentator You would get tony greg or Danny Morrison
abdulbasitb Says:
Mar 5, 2012 - correct. with his 3rd touch, if he had his foot on the ground b4 he touched the ball, it would have been a catch out. but if observed carefully he didnt; he was unlucky to have missed by a few milliseconds, but he's lucky actually, that the umpires missed to notice it
Jayjay03025 Says:
Mar 4, 2012 - Is that really the rule? I have seen a few catches taken by a fielder who has thrown the ball back into play from an airborn position outside the boundary and then taken the catch inside the rope ... but I guess the difference is that those catches are only considered legitimate if the fielder is on the ground while taking the catch ...
so actually by jumping over the rope rather than stepping back over the rope and taking it, david hussey actually fumbled it by being airborn?
abdulbasitb Says:
Mar 4, 2012 - that rule is 4 fielder on ground. 1st of all, u need to decide that 3rd touch he made, was fielder on ground or airborne? ans=airborne. cricket law 19.4 states that if a fielder touches the ball when he is airborne, then his final contact with ground, b4 touching the ball applies (ie where he took his jump from, that's his final contact with ground) so his 3rd airborne touch is wrong, bcoz his final contact with ground b4 touching the ball in air was from outside
Jayjay03025 Says:
Mar 4, 2012 - Both of you are very wrong. It is definitely out and not a six.
At no point was the ball in contact with the fielder while the fielder was in contact with something outside the boundary. He caught the ball inside the boundary without his foot or any part of his body outside the boundary or on the boundary.
The bottom line is he caught the ball within the boundary.
Come on guys ...
abdulbasitb Says:
Feb 26, 2012 - Yes I think the same. Should be a six. His first two touches with the ball were fine, but at his last touch with the ball when he was airborne, the last contact of his foot was from outside boundary. So it should be a six.
UtopiaIsInMyMind Says:
Feb 24, 2012 - LOL what an EFFORT, god he's stupid
Iafeta1000 Says:
Feb 13, 2012 - Thats a six he didnt get back in play before catching it. Good effort though
TheXPrisoner Says:
Jan 20, 2012 - People react to catches and take some , some dive and it falls into thier hands, some are flexible enough to dive and reach a certain area but this is the kind of catch which needs every presence of mind, composure , technique, flexibility, and brilliance.
The best catch ever for me but i do not feel wrong with Ravi Shastri there as randomking said. Anyways, i watched this live so then the commentry felt different as well and was justifying to that current situation.
shutupaurmouth Says:
Dec 21, 2011 - that it was collingwood makes it better... serves him right for all the impossible catches he got people out with.
randomking333 Says:
Dec 21, 2011 - @pseudofool well at least you arnt being arrogant unlike everyone e on utube, i personally havr followed cricket for about 13 years very closely and commentators have a hard job, they cant go hyper over every wicket. but i respect your opinion
pseudofool Says:
Dec 20, 2011 - The last one to post wins the debate, ain't it? It could go on forever, but I stop at this. I really don't like how biased Shastri and Gavaskar when they act as commentators. And yes, not a big cricketing fan/expert either, but I think my opinions are fairly justified in terms of content. If not, well, its just an opinion after all, isn't it?
randomking333 Says:
Dec 20, 2011 - why did u assume in a physical cricketing sense? Not good to make leaps of assumptions, Im sure uve not become a great media expert on the game either. So take refuge behind your keyboard and type bravely.
pseudofool Says:
Dec 18, 2011 - So my cricket record has some relation with my sense of judgement of praise/appreciation? These kind of arguments haven't been valid since primary school mate.
randomking333 Says:
Dec 17, 2011 - ok then you're just a very poor judge of commentary. Good for you, im sure youve amounted to more than Ravi Shastri
pseudofool Says:
Dec 17, 2011 - I too am an Indian, you jingoistic bigot :) Learn to call a spade a spade...
randomking333 Says:
Dec 17, 2011 - what the hell more did you want you racist retard?
Mwal00 Says:
Dec 11, 2011 - even better than the one voges did :)
MrBen51309 Says:
Oct 18, 2011 - Great effort by Hussey, but that should have been held onto first time. Nowhere near the best in history.
98achin Says:
Oct 6, 2011 - this is a classical example why cricket is better than football or any other game......
you see this kind of efforts in cricket
tdj444 Says:
Jul 19, 2011 - Amazing. Check this too :D /watch?v=saKJdNhDB_4
Video Details
Hussies catch in IPL. Delhi Dare Devils vs Kolkkata Knight Riders 29.03.2010 More
Hussies catch in IPL. Delhi Dare Devils vs Kolkkata Knight Riders 29.03.2010 Less
Post a comment
Local Comments (0)
Youtube Comments (56)
Jimmy911ism Says:
Mar 13, 2012 - It's not the best catch, but maybe the best one with the stupid rules they have now. Once it crosses the rope it should be six. It's a shocking rule and it must be changed.
London6614 Says:
Mar 10, 2012 - There are couple of players in world take catches like that I saw Matthews, Kapugedara, Dilshan, and Herath of Sl team , Hussey , Jonty rodes, Roshan Mahanama, Kalapge
London6614 Says:
Mar 10, 2012 - wow its like Sri Lankan fielder Angelo Matthews did in 2010
SuperUltraKO Says:
Mar 6, 2012 - yeah Ravi shastri is a lame comentator You would get tony greg or Danny Morrison
abdulbasitb Says:
Mar 5, 2012 - correct. with his 3rd touch, if he had his foot on the ground b4 he touched the ball, it would have been a catch out. but if observed carefully he didnt; he was unlucky to have missed by a few milliseconds, but he's lucky actually, that the umpires missed to notice it
Jayjay03025 Says:
Mar 4, 2012 - Is that really the rule? I have seen a few catches taken by a fielder who has thrown the ball back into play from an airborn position outside the boundary and then taken the catch inside the rope ... but I guess the difference is that those catches are only considered legitimate if the fielder is on the ground while taking the catch ... so actually by jumping over the rope rather than stepping back over the rope and taking it, david hussey actually fumbled it by being airborn?
abdulbasitb Says:
Mar 4, 2012 - that rule is 4 fielder on ground. 1st of all, u need to decide that 3rd touch he made, was fielder on ground or airborne? ans=airborne. cricket law 19.4 states that if a fielder touches the ball when he is airborne, then his final contact with ground, b4 touching the ball applies (ie where he took his jump from, that's his final contact with ground) so his 3rd airborne touch is wrong, bcoz his final contact with ground b4 touching the ball in air was from outside
Jayjay03025 Says:
Mar 4, 2012 - Both of you are very wrong. It is definitely out and not a six. At no point was the ball in contact with the fielder while the fielder was in contact with something outside the boundary. He caught the ball inside the boundary without his foot or any part of his body outside the boundary or on the boundary. The bottom line is he caught the ball within the boundary. Come on guys ...
abdulbasitb Says:
Feb 26, 2012 - Yes I think the same. Should be a six. His first two touches with the ball were fine, but at his last touch with the ball when he was airborne, the last contact of his foot was from outside boundary. So it should be a six.
UtopiaIsInMyMind Says:
Feb 24, 2012 - LOL what an EFFORT, god he's stupid
Iafeta1000 Says:
Feb 13, 2012 - Thats a six he didnt get back in play before catching it. Good effort though
TheXPrisoner Says:
Jan 20, 2012 - People react to catches and take some , some dive and it falls into thier hands, some are flexible enough to dive and reach a certain area but this is the kind of catch which needs every presence of mind, composure , technique, flexibility, and brilliance. The best catch ever for me but i do not feel wrong with Ravi Shastri there as randomking said. Anyways, i watched this live so then the commentry felt different as well and was justifying to that current situation.
shutupaurmouth Says:
Dec 21, 2011 - that it was collingwood makes it better... serves him right for all the impossible catches he got people out with.
randomking333 Says:
Dec 21, 2011 - @pseudofool well at least you arnt being arrogant unlike everyone e on utube, i personally havr followed cricket for about 13 years very closely and commentators have a hard job, they cant go hyper over every wicket. but i respect your opinion
pseudofool Says:
Dec 20, 2011 - The last one to post wins the debate, ain't it? It could go on forever, but I stop at this. I really don't like how biased Shastri and Gavaskar when they act as commentators. And yes, not a big cricketing fan/expert either, but I think my opinions are fairly justified in terms of content. If not, well, its just an opinion after all, isn't it?
randomking333 Says:
Dec 20, 2011 - why did u assume in a physical cricketing sense? Not good to make leaps of assumptions, Im sure uve not become a great media expert on the game either. So take refuge behind your keyboard and type bravely.
pseudofool Says:
Dec 18, 2011 - So my cricket record has some relation with my sense of judgement of praise/appreciation? These kind of arguments haven't been valid since primary school mate.
randomking333 Says:
Dec 17, 2011 - ok then you're just a very poor judge of commentary. Good for you, im sure youve amounted to more than Ravi Shastri
pseudofool Says:
Dec 17, 2011 - I too am an Indian, you jingoistic bigot :) Learn to call a spade a spade...
randomking333 Says:
Dec 17, 2011 - what the hell more did you want you racist retard?
Mwal00 Says:
Dec 11, 2011 - even better than the one voges did :)
MrBen51309 Says:
Oct 18, 2011 - Great effort by Hussey, but that should have been held onto first time. Nowhere near the best in history.
98achin Says:
Oct 6, 2011 - this is a classical example why cricket is better than football or any other game...... you see this kind of efforts in cricket
tdj444 Says:
Jul 19, 2011 - Amazing. Check this too :D /watch?v=saKJdNhDB_4